In defence of the
homophobic gay guy.
If you’re gay
you’ve probably seen that article from Gay Times- or at least the
headline in all it’s baited glory. You’ll also no doubt have seen
the comments, or the quoted retweets. Scum! Get into the sea. Shut
the fuck up! Umm, no! Etcetera etcetera etcetera. (If you haven’t
already read it,click here and give it 5 minutes of your time.)
The headline itself
does what its supposed to do; evoke a response, in this case anything
ranging from disbelief to rage. Perhaps it made you feel a bit too
much, commenting or retweeting your disdain without having read past
the byline, but read on and you’ll find things aren’t quite as
they appear…
The article starts
as you would expect, the questions one faces when coming out, nothing
shocking there. We’ve already been prompted by the headline to
expect homophobic themes throughout – they’re blatant, but you
don’t need two thirds of a psychology degree to spot the confusion
staggering from start to finish. This confusion, or cognitive
dissonance, gives us context and an insight in the mind of a gay guy
with some internalised homophobia.
It’s important to
note that when we talk of homophobia regarding this GT article, we’re
talking about casual homophobia as opposed to outright homophobia.
The latter is your bog standard ‘kick the queer’s head in!’
kind, while the former is more ‘I don’t have a problem with gay
people, I just don’t want them rubbing it in my face’. (Rubbing
it one’s face usually means ‘please don’t kiss in front of me,
two men kissing is gross’ - more on that later)
Cereal Killer (CK)
lets us in on the fact he was a victim of homophobia during school
– just as many of us were. He freely admits it left its mark, and
yet towards the close of the article he reveals that in a recent
interview he claimed homophobia never had much of an impact. How does
he explain this cognitive dissonance? He doesn’t. He probably isn’t
even aware he said the two conflicting statements, but he has
admitted this homophobia confuses him. The mental disorientation
doesn’t end there - after telling us he accepted being gay when he
was sixteen, CK then confides that eighteen years later he still
hasn’t accepted it 100%. Again, the disparity is addressed by
neither CK nor interviewer – again probably slipping under the
gaydar.
There is another
telling bit where he refers to his sexuality as forced – what this
means I do not know. Is it an act? Can one feel pressured into being
gay? I’m at a loss.
And as if this isn’t
enough, the home run comes at the end -
“Am I happy in my
sexuality? Yes. If I could shake a magic wand and make myself
straight tomorrow would I? Yes. Am I happy about that? NO.”
Stop. Look. Read. In
one sentence the man tells us he’s happy in his sexuality, then in
the very next breath he tells us he would alter his sexuality if he
could. Are these really the words of a man happy and comfortable in
his sexuality? One could argue that he couldn’t really be in love
with his ‘amazing boyfriend’ if he truly thinks this, but people
in love (gay or straight) do stupid things all the time, and shocker,
they also do things that are selfish and to the detriment of their
partners.
This isn’t the
interview of someone who deserves to be branded scum, or told they’re
harming the gay community, this is the outlook of someone who is
realising that Dale Winton and Julian Clarey, tank tops and Kylie,
are not the four corners of the gay community. This is someone who
needs a cup of coffee and a weekend with The Velvet Rage.
Internalised
homophobia is a thing – it has reared its ugly head in all of us at
some point – some still have it – from the masc4masc guys who
hate queens to the closet cases who can’t understand why we even
need Pride. Some of us get over it, some of us don’t – but it
does take time, and an understanding of others and ourselves.
I’m tempted to
paraphrase Mean Girls and I’ve yet to resist temptation, so I
shan’t start now – We have got to stop calling each other names,
it only tells straight people that it’s okay to call us names. This
is the interview of a clearly confused individual, one who has yet to
become comfortable in their own skin. Accepting who and what we are
is never easy, and the problem is only compounded when you’ve got a
world telling you you’re not quite right – we should be helping
and supporting others, not raining down righteous condemnation.
Let’s put this in
perspective, CK never called for the stoning of fags, nor banning the
mention of us in school, his biggest crime was saying he’s still
not comfortable with other gay guys showing affection in public –
just as he is not comfortable showing gay affection in public. Yes,
gay affection, because I have no doubt he’d have no issue kissing a
girl in public.
There’s enough
hate directed at us from the outside, let’s not start attacking
from the inside too.